Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:34

Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Tuesday Telescope: Lighting, sprites, and airglow over Central America - Ars Technica
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Who was the most ignorant American you have ever met?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Smallest Dinosaur Ever Discovered Was Just… - The Daily Galaxy
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Was Daenerys' downfall inevitable after she left Meereen in Game of Thrones?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How can I plan a zero-waste vacation without compromising on comfort?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Did another parent ever tell you something about your child that you didn’t know?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
5 Simple Walking Tricks That Burn Fat and Build Muscle, According to a Trainer - Eat This Not That
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
You May Want To Think Twice Before You Eat Bagged Lettuce - HuffPost
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.